The Oregon State Beavers recently unveiled their new football uniforms ahead of the spring game, and while social media reactions have been mixed, with some positive feedback, a closer look reveals significant design flaws. As a dedicated follower of college football aesthetics, I must express my disappointment: these new uniforms simply miss the mark.
The most immediate issue is the perplexing blocky strips on the shoulder pads. These thick, rectangular shapes feel jarring and disconnected. Instead of creating a sleek or dynamic look, they clash with the traditional stripes on the pants and helmet. This shoulder design element appears awkwardly placed and disrupts any sense of visual harmony across the uniform. It’s a baffling design choice that detracts from the overall aesthetic.
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/9069703/usa_today_8876162.jpg)
Another significant drawback is the decision to use a single helmet design across all three uniform color variations. Historically, Oregon State has sported distinct orange and white helmets, which were fan favorites and added visual interest. The new helmet design itself isn’t particularly inspiring; the Beaver logo appears oversized and lacks the refined appeal one expects from a major program. Opting for just one helmet design gives the impression of budget constraints rather than a deliberate stylistic choice, diminishing the overall presentation of the Oregon State football program.
Furthermore, the inclusion of “Beavs” lettering above the jersey numbers raises questions. While “Go Beavs!” is a spirited rallying cry, emblazoning “Beavs” on the jersey itself seems informal and arguably unprofessional for a Power Five program. It’s a nickname best reserved for fan chants, not the focal point of a jersey design. While initial concerns about the absence of player names on the back were addressed, the “Beavs” lettering remains a questionable design element.
Ultimately, these uniform missteps underscore a broader concern: Oregon State’s partnership with Nike. While Nike is a sportswear giant with innovative products, Oregon State consistently seems to receive less attention and creative input compared to the University of Oregon, Nike’s flagship school. The disparity is evident – Oregon often boasts cutting-edge, attention-grabbing uniform designs, while Oregon State receives comparatively generic treatments. This perceived second-tier status within the Nike umbrella was highlighted by events like the PK80 tournament, where Oregon was invited, Portland State received an invite, but Oregon State was notably excluded, seemingly a deliberate snub from Nike founder Phil Knight.
While logistical or financial factors may favor sticking with Nike, Oregon State should seriously consider switching to Under Armour or Adidas. As long as the partnership with Nike persists, Oregon State risks remaining in the shadow of its in-state rival, receiving understated uniforms while Oregon enjoys the bold, recruit-attracting designs. To truly elevate its football program’s image and brand, Oregon State needs a uniform identity that reflects its own unique spirit and ambition, potentially found outside of the Nike shadow.
