When Army Regulation 670-1 (AR 670-1) underwent revisions a year prior, it sparked considerable debate. While discussions largely centered on modifications to tattoo regulations and women’s hairstyles, a less publicized alteration prohibited air travel while in Army Combat Uniforms (ACUs). The Army Service Uniform (ASU), often referred to as “Blues,” remained an option for travel, yet its impracticality for airport transit was evident. The discomfort and excessive metal components posed challenges for airport security. Despite these drawbacks, certain situations, particularly for recruiters, necessitated travel in the ASU.
The rationale behind the initial restriction, as understood, was a desire by Army leadership to enhance public perception, mirroring the standards upheld by the Marine Corps. Marines are seldom seen in their duty uniforms off-base, with strict protocols even preventing brief stops in uniform for errands. In contrast, Marines in airports consistently project a sharp image, typically in Class A or Class B uniforms (verification of uniform classification is welcome). The intention behind the Army’s original policy was thus understandable – to cultivate a more polished public appearance.
However, much like the Army reconsidered and relaxed policies concerning tattoos and hairstyles, a similar re-evaluation has occurred regarding uniform usage during travel. As of March 18th, soldiers are once again authorized to travel in ACUs. While not perceived as a monumental victory, this policy adjustment is a welcome change for many. Traveling in any uniform is inherently less comfortable and navigating security checkpoints can be cumbersome, particularly with boots that may or may not contain shanks. Recalling which boots are compliant adds another layer of complexity. Yet, numerous instances arise, such as unit visits with tight schedules, where immediate transit from aircraft to duty location is crucial. Similarly, rushing to catch connecting flights often necessitates speed and ease of movement. Changing into and out of uniforms in airport restrooms presented a significant inconvenience.
Illustrative of uniform-related travel challenges is the experience of 1SG Albert Marle, a National Guard NCO from Virginia. In an unfortunate incident, a flight attendant declined his request to hang his uniform jacket, leading to an apology from US Airways. Details of this event are available in an Army Times article.
Will this revised rule lead to constant ACU travel? Probably not. However, the option itself is valuable. It provides flexibility and acknowledges the practical needs of soldiers. As for the Marines, their commitment to a consistently sharp “dress to impress” standard undoubtedly contributes to their recruiting success. The Army’s updated policy seems to strike a balance between professional image and practical considerations for its personnel.
